ACTFL Conference part 1: class outcome

I went to the ACTFL Conference in Orlando, Florida, this weekend. Needless to say (I hope), I’m a bit wiped out, even though I attended only four sessions. (The rest of the time I was having a blast teaching Russian.)

I can’t remember the exact title of the session I’d like to talk about, but I think it was something like “Student-Led Language Classes.” We got examples of lessons from two levels of courses taught in the PDL method. They were strange enough that many people actually walked out of the session. Still, I was fascinated, especially by the sample exercise for a level 2 class. I was pretty sure that I had not retained anything out of the level 1 class.

When I woke up this morning spouting some German phrases that I understood, I had to share the experience with my kids. I told them the setup would be unusual. We did the warm-ups I’d seen from the level 1 class, and then set up for a role play. I put out three chairs as our presenter had done, and the students suggested situations. Their voting led to our using “couple therapy.” Our St. Petersburg couple (the only couple) sat down next to each other and another student offered to be the counselor.

The presenter had told us that first he would ask general questions of the players in the drama: how old they were, where they lived, and so on. I asked the “counselor” how long she had been working in the clinic, and where the clinic was. She explained she’d been working there two years, and that the clinic was in a small house in a park. Then I asked the other two students questions.

The rest of the class was divided into support groups for the students in the role play. They sat behind the person they were supporting. If I asked a question that the players couldn’t answer or couldn’t think of an answer to give, the support groups helped. These kids, raised on a diet of TPRS, were ready to play the game, and it developed at about the same rate as a story and pretty much in the same way, except that the individuals in the game had to keep thinking and listening so as to adapt their own answers. (At one point, two of the support members literally ran across the room to grab books in which they’d seen useful retorts. I might have to outlaw that practice to make them use words they have acquired.)

We ran out of time before the counselor could ask more than one question. She came up afterward and said that she didn’t know many questions that she could ask. We agreed that the questions she’d like to be able to ask are questions that friends also often ask one another, and that they would be helpful for real connections with Russians. I started to see how this method is student-driven.

I wrote up a report of the situation to date for the class to read tomorrow. I think that’s what the presenter said they do. He had also said something about keeping a list of the vocabulary for students.

The next phase, once we play out the questions just a little more, is to turn the three groups into strategy sessions. The students are to plan out more what they will say (and how to say it). I am supposed to wander around the groups and help them as needed. Then I will write the whole thing up again for them to read.

I wish there was more information on the website than the brief examples that they give. As a program, PDL level 2 seems to be heavily based on output, but my advanced class had a lot of fun with my understanding of it today. I did do a lot of supporting during my questioning time, and I did some reporting back to the class as well as rephrasing. The time flew by, because all the kids were completely engaged in the developing story.

If anyone out there knows more about PDL, or has sites that explain it (for free!), I’d love to have the information.

Advertisements

7 responses to “ACTFL Conference part 1: class outcome

  1. I’m dying to hear how it went!!!

    Like

  2. I LOVED (Ya lubila) your presentations! I am going to dust of my copy of Bednaya Ana now because of you…

    Like

  3. The second session went even better than the first, probably because the kids had had some time to plot and plan. When they walked into class yesterday, they basically insisted that we continue the story. I had written up the scenario from the day before, to achieve my goal of comprehensible input and repetition of all that vocabulary, and then we started from the beginning. I asked the same questions, and the role-players answered them again, with a little more detail, and then they launched into the roles very actively.

    After a time, I realized that they needed some help figuring out what to do next, and I turned them into the recommended “strategy groups.” They huddled for a few minutes, looking very mischievous, and then we set off again. The story they came up with was perhaps, while not R-rated, not quite one I should post here. It involved claims of infidelity, disappointment with completion of household tasks (hurrah! I’ve never been able to get chores covered in any interesting ways), and discussion of who did the cooking and how that turned out.

    The next piece I’ll try (not ’till Tuesday now, because of the Thanksgiving break) is to follow the instructions to change something. Either break the kids into new groups, where each of them is a player in the role, or change the perspective.

    I’m pretty excited about this technique for upper level language classes. I think it has great potential for CI-trained kids. It is truly student-centered, because they get the language they want to use. I’m not sure exactly how to work writing in here, but I’ll keep studying the sites. One of my best kids stayed after yesterday and said that she could feel her language growing because she had to talk. I didn’t like that much…she knows I don’t believe that talking teaches us…and then she said that it forced her to problem-solve in the language because she didn’t know what the counselor would ask or what her “husband” would say. I did like hearing that.

    Like

  4. Pingback: PDL, part 2 | mjTPRS

  5. Pingback: PDL combined | mjTPRS

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s